Skip to content
KOPFSACHE
← Science
Evidence: Strong

Process and goal setting

Specific, controllable goals for execution and behaviour instead of outcome goals like wins or scoring rates.

Intended for

Direct attention and motivation towards what is within one's control.

Who does the evidence apply to?

Very broad evidence base across sport, school, and work.

Boundaries

Too many or too rigid goals increase pressure. Outcome goals alone often worsen experience and execution.

In athlete speak

You can't decide if you score. You can decide how you approach the shot.

Accessible doesn't mean inaccurate: We simplify the language, not the message.

For Parents

What we know

Specific, challenging process goals improve performance and endurance.

What we don't know

How many goals are sensible at the same time.

What that means in practice

After the game, ask about processes, not statistics.

Sources

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist.Specialist LiteraturePopulation: Cross-cutting, incl. SportDOI 10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
  • Kyllo, L. B., & Landers, D. M. (1995). Goal setting in sport and exercise: A research synthesis to resolve the controversy. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology.Meta-AnalysisPopulation: Sporting SamplesDOI 10.1123/jsep.17.2.117

Content on this method

These contents are knowledge and training offerings from sport psychology. They do not replace psychotherapy, medical treatment, or professional sport psychological support.